STRKNG Trend

Overview | Images | Trend Photographers | Trend Models | New level

The STRKNG ranking is calculated every hour on the basis of a lot of data. See also FAQ on this page.

The key point for the previous ranking is the Friday of the week.

With the links above you can see which pictures and participants are currently trending and which participants have switched to a higher level in one or more of their subject areas in the last few days.

The following graphics show exemplary participant ranking changes in the subject areas of the last few days with comparatively large fluctuations.
The reason for a sudden sag is usually the deletion of a well-rated image from the subject area.
The reason for a continuous rise is the upload of strong images in the subject area.

 
2
Ann Sophie / People  photography by Photographer Dominik Leiner ★5 | STRKNG

Ann Sophie - © Dominik Leiner

2
Helena / Nude  photography by Photographer Dan Matthews ★2 | STRKNG

Helena - © Dan Matthews
Helena F

2
1
Pause / People  photography by Photographer Lutz Zipser - 27eins ★2 | STRKNG

Pause - © Lutz Zipser - 27eins

1
Beth / Portrait  photography by Photographer Thomas Rumprath ★2 | STRKNG

Beth - © Thomas Rumprath
Beth

Bea / Nude  photography by Photographer Schattenkünstler ★9 | STRKNG

Bea - © Schattenkünstler

2
Milena #1 / Nude  photography by Photographer Timo Karlsson ★8 | STRKNG

Milena #1 - © Timo Karlsson

Bologna LOVERS / People  photography by Photographer Sara Lorusso ★2 | STRKNG

Bologna LOVERS - © Sara Lorusso

 
5
5
Fly / Fine Art  photography by Model Soulmate1975 ★2 | STRKNG

Fly - © Soulmate1975

Portrait  photography by Model Emerika ★7 | STRKNG

- © Emerika

7
Nude  photography by Model Emerika ★7 | STRKNG

- © Emerika

Black and White  photography by Model Miss Equerel | STRKNG

- © Miss Equerel

4
Silence / Nude  photography by Model Mavka_ann ★6 | STRKNG

Silence - © Mavka_ann

 
9
Nude  photography by Model Di ★19 | STRKNG

- © Di

 
13
Floating by Carlos Rodrigues / Nude  photography by Model Rahel van der Meer ★12 | STRKNG

Floating by Carlos Rodrigues - © Rahel van der Meer

Woman #124 / Fine Art  photography by Model Chaotic Lullaby ★2 | STRKNG

Woman #124 - © Chaotic Lullaby
Nasos Karabelas

10203040506070809010012345678910RankingRating2024

Beside stars, bookmarks, blog- and imagevotings it is very important that influential people (with a high ranking) like your work.
Is also very good, if you're named as participants in other image that shows that your work is also used.

Levels are a dynamic grouping of portfolios by rank.
They break down as follows:

Figure: Distribution of portfolio levelsFigure: Distribution of portfolio levels

A ranking within a topic area is only created when there are enough participants.
We consider the overall ranking and the ranking within a specialized topic area of the participant separately. The overall ranking is not published.
The current ranking is calculated at longer intervals. The difference to the last time always relates to the weekly value on Friday.

Each participant has a limited number of that they can distribute anonymously to the best pictures, photographers and models.
The should only be distributed to the top participants and best works and can be withdrawn and redistributed at any time.
The distribution of the has a decisive influence on the overall ranking.

The symbol only appears from 10 stars above a portfolio image.
The statistics provide information on the composition of the origin of the stars.

We look at the overall ranking and ranking within a category separately using the portfolio level, see also further above.


Figure: Distribution of portfolio levelsFigure: Distribution of portfolio levels
Figure: Example of statisticsFigure: Example of statistics

Interpretation aid of the example

11.5% of the stars came from participants with level .
This corresponds to the normal distribution (~ 10%).

General experts like this image.

19.2% of the stars came from participants with level from the category of the image.
This corresponds to an above-average distribution.
Almost half (total 38.5%) of the star ratings from the category comes from the top level.

The image appeals to the category participants of the level very much.

19.2% of the stars came from participants with level .
This corresponds to the normal distribution (~ 20%).

With the category participants also ( 20% from 38.5% = 7.7% ).

The participants with level like the image.

50% of the stars came from participants with level .
This corresponds to an above-average distribution (> 30%).
On the other site the category participants with level seem not to like the image that much.
-

19.2% of the stars came from guests and beginners of STRKNG.
This corresponds to a below average distribution (<40%).

The same applies to the category participants ( 20% of 38.5% = 7.7% ).

The image is not so much liked at this level.

38.5% of the stars came from category participants.

This is a considerable size for this category, which is not so strongly represented on STRKNG.

Our conclusion:
»The image is a real treat for connoisseurs of the subject.
Muggles cannot get so much out of the image.«

Remarks:

  • VIP users can view these statistics in their dashboard for their own pictures from the first star to understand the effect of their images on the target groups.
  • The participant portfolios remain without statistics for their own presentation.

Use the to bookmark inspiring work, or to follow the work of a specific participants.
The distribution of has a slight influence on the overall ranking.

A contingent of / can be assigned every day . It renews itself. This has a slight influence on the overall ranking.